This is the working public map for the IPAS paper trail: centre, supplier, company, holding entity, and named public-record person or entity where the evidence is strong enough to show. It does not claim that every payment supplier is a live IPAS centre operator; it shows the audit trail visible in public payment data and marks unmapped suppliers for follow-up.

465payment-derived active accommodation suppliers in 2026 Q1 from the Public Data Unpacked transaction export.
EUR300.43mactive accommodation total in those 2026 Q1 supplier rows. Supplier names can differ from public centre names.
107provider/person/entity trails visualised from the private ledger and existing source base.
106active payment suppliers currently have a named reported director, shareholder, holding entity or UBO-trail endpoint.
53provider cases currently reach a named person endpoint, still subject to CRO/RBO confirmation unless marked verified.
84provider cases still expose company/shareholder layers that need recursive shell-company tracing.

Evidence rule. This page uses public payment records, official audit material, Oireachtas/government sources, company-register style evidence, and credible reporting. A named person or entity here is not an allegation of wrongdoing. “Unknown” means the public paper trail has not yet proved the beneficial-owner or centre mapping.

1. Visual ownership/payment trail

Select a case to see the current evidence path from centre to payment supplier, reported holding structure, and named public-record people or entities. The full active supplier list follows below.

IPAS centre to provider to ownership trail

2. Centre location map and ownership chain

This is the centre-first map: every mapped centre/location currently in the audit ledger, the linked provider or supplier bucket, and the public-record ownership/person chain currently visible. Exact public addresses and approximate town/locality matches are marked separately.

Exact public address Approximate public town/locality

Centre / location County Linked provider Ownership / person trail Status

3. UBO evidence board

This board separates a legal beneficial-owner claim from weaker public-record trails. It shows whether each mapped provider reaches a named person, stops at a shareholder/holding company, or only has director/associated-person evidence. Rows marked as needing RBO still require CRO/RBO confirmation before they should be treated as confirmed beneficial ownership.

Download shell-recursion CSV

Provider / company UBO evidence status Endpoint Unresolved shell / shareholder layer Linked centre(s)

4. Persons and entities of interest

This is the person/entity-first view. It ties named public-record people, shareholders, holding companies and reported UBO-trail endpoints back to the provider and centre rows currently supported by the audit ledger. Click a row to redraw the visual trail.

Public-record person or entity linked to provider and centre rows
Person / entity Evidence role Linked provider(s) Linked centre(s) Confidence

5. Shell-company recursion queue

This is the live worklist for the paper trail. It ranks unresolved company/shareholder layers by 2026 Q1 active accommodation payments, then shows the current endpoint and the next register or FOI step needed before any beneficial-owner claim can be upgraded.

Download queue CSV

Priority Provider / supplier 2026 Q1 active total Current endpoint Unresolved shell layer Next paper-trail step

6. Active accommodation suppliers, 2026 Q1

The table below lists every supplier in the payment-derived active accommodation extract. It is the start of the audit trail, not the end of it: each row still needs centre, CRO, beneficial-owner, planning, fire-safety and contract-status reconciliation.

Download CSV

Rank Supplier 2026 Q1 total Mapped provider Mapped centre(s) UBO / person trail Audit status

7. Next audit steps

  • Match every payment supplier to CRO/company-register records, including unlimited-company status and any cross-border holding entity.
  • Reconcile supplier names to centre names using IPAS/HIQA inspection pages, planning files, fire-safety certificate registers, media reports and FOI/PQ returns.
  • Separate IP accommodation, Ukraine accommodation, security, catering, management and related-cost suppliers where payment groups overlap.
  • Publish standalone centre case files only after the named-centre, named-company and ownership evidence clears the source threshold and right-of-reply checks.

Sources